Will employees see this as surveillance?

The framing matters, and Asgard is built for it: the system guides learners back into compliance rather than flagging and failing them. Most organisations position it as making everyone's completions count, not as monitoring individuals.

Does this create more work for the compliance team?

It is designed not to. Because sessions are corrected in the moment rather than flagged for later review, the usual overhead of a detection-based approach — review queues, disputes, retakes — is substantially reduced.

Can we apply it to only some courses?

Yes. Many organisations start with the highest-exposure modules, such as anti-bribery, data protection or conduct training, and extend from there.

Do we need IT to build an integration?

No. Asgard works within your existing training files and is compatible with any training platform or HR system, so there is no integration project to schedule.

How is this reported to the board?

Through dashboards and exportable reports covering verification details, access history, participation and completion status, at whatever level of aggregation your reporting needs.

Verified completions for corporate compliance training

Annual policy, ethics, anti-bribery and data protection training is the control that boards point to. Asgard makes those completion numbers mean something by verifying the employee behind each one.

Start free trial Talk to our team

Corporate employee completing online compliance training in an open-plan office

The completion rate is the metric, and it is the weakest part

The completion percentage reported to the board is assembled entirely from login events, and everyone inside the business knows how thin that is.

The number carries more weight than it earns

A completion percentage goes to the board and sometimes a regulator, but it's assembled entirely from login events.

Everyday behaviour degrades the data

Background-tab modules, quarter-end completion clusters and assistants completing training for executives all quietly erode the figure's evidentiary value.

It becomes the whole argument

When training is invoked as a defence, the difference between a completion record and a verified one becomes the entire question.

What undermines corporate completion data

Delegated completions

Assistants and colleagues complete mandatory modules for busy staff. The name on the record is correct; the person who took the training is not.

Background-tab training

Modules play unattended while the employee works, producing plausible time-on-task with no engagement behind it.

AI agents at scale

Where employees have access to AI tools, an entire mandatory course can be completed without a person present, and the record looks entirely normal.

Quarter-end completion spikes

Compressed deadlines drive click-through behaviour, which is precisely when the training is least effective and most reported on.

Distributed and remote workforces

There is no observer, no room and no shared context — only an account and a completion flag.

Board-level reporting risk

Figures presented as assurance rest on data that cannot be substantiated if it is challenged.

How Asgard changes what the number means

Asgard verifies the employee behind each mandatory module, so the completion number reported to the board is backed by evidence.

A verified person, not a browser

The employee is verified at the start of each module and their participation confirmed through it, so completion attaches to a real person.

Guided back, not flagged and failed

Employees are prompted back into the session rather than failed, avoiding the review queues and escalations a detection-first approach creates.

Reporting that survives a follow-up question

Completion by business unit and an affidavit per individual are available without an integration project or moving content off your platform.

What changes with verified learners

Without Asgard

Completion percentage is built from login events alone
Background-tab and clustered completions go unnoticed
No evidence if a completion is later challenged
Detection-first reviews create HR overhead

With Asgard

Each completion is attached to a verified employee
Participation confirmed through the session, not just login
An affidavit is available for any disputed record
Learners guided back instead of flagged and failed

Reporting that stands up to a follow-up question

Asgard provides evidence for the assurance you already report. It does not certify that your compliance programme satisfies any specific regulation.

Verified identity attached to each mandatory training completion
Participation evidence across the session, not just a final assessment score
Access history showing when the training was genuinely undertaken
Dashboards and exportable reports by individual, team or business unit
Tamper-proof affidavits for any completion that is later disputed
Identity continuity across annual cycles, so this year's record connects to previous ones

Capabilities compliance teams use most

Learner authentication

Facial recognition and ID verification, on device, to confirm the right person is taking the training.

Real-time compliance guidance

Live participation monitoring prompts learners back on track the moment engagement drifts, so sessions finish compliant.

AI and proxy detection

Detection built to prevent AI tools and stand-in test takers from completing training on a learner's behalf.

Audit-ready reporting

Dashboards and exportable reports packaging verification details, access history, participation metrics and completion status.

Works with your training platform

Asgard complements your current systems rather than replacing your training platform, authoring tools or content provider.

Identity continuity across courses

Once a learner is verified, Asgard recognises them across future courses, refreshers and renewals — no repeat ID uploads.

How it works in an annual training cycle

1
Roll out against existing modules
Your current policy and ethics content is wrapped with verification. No re-authoring, no platform migration, no integration project.
2
Employees verify and complete
A short identity check opens the module, and participation guidance keeps the session valid without failing people for ordinary interruptions.
3
Report with evidence attached
Completion figures come with verification behind them, and any individual record can be substantiated on request.

Research Asgard independently

Ratings and reviews on these platforms are published and moderated by the platforms themselves, not by Asgard.

Frequently asked questions

Make your completion numbers defensible

Start the free trial on one high-exposure module and compare the evidence it produces against the record you have today.

Start free trial Contact sales